What a “free press”–pause here for laughter–means to Newark: Cowardice

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Share on StumbleUpon
NJTV--wimping out
NJTV–wimping out

For the first time in nearly two centuries, Newark–the largest city in the eighth largest state in America–will not be home to a daily newspaper. After Sept. 8, The Star-Ledger will move its operations to Woodbridge and Edison, leaving the city newspaperless for the first time since the Daily Advertiser opened in the city in  1832. That’s a big story but government-controlled media in New Jersey won’t allow a discussion of it. NJTV News–your public broadcast station–chickened out.

The implications for the city and the state are worth some comment, but, by and large, the escape of The Star-Ledger to the suburbs has gone unnoticed. That’s why it seemed such a good idea for NJTV News, or whatever the allegedly public television station is called now, scheduled a show next week on the implications of the move.

Guy Sterling, a long-time Star-Ledger reporter and Newark resident, was scheduled to be on the show–now there’s a guy who could talk about the city and its news coverage. Joan Whitlow, another veteran of the newspaper, a Newark columnist, and a city resident, also was invited, but had a conflict. I was invited, too, and I accepted, eager to discuss what had been my professional home since 1964, before much of the current management was born. To replace Ms. Whitlow, Guy and  I both put forward the name of Stanley Terrell, a great reporter, columnist, editorial writer, city resident, and hero of the uprising at Rahway State Prison.

None of us was bothered when we were told the management of the newspaper would be asked to send a representative–but we didn’t know whether management would send someone. Leaving Newark is, well, an indelicate issue–but I thought, hell, Guy and Stanley and I all love the newspaper and we certainly would not make any of our former colleagues feel uncomfortable. Guy thought no one would show; I thought someone would.

Guy was right. The newspaper declined to have a current employee represent the newspaper on Michael Aron’s “Off the Record”–oh, I am sorry, that’s “On the Record”– show scheduled for next weekend.

Then, Aron dropped the bomb. Because the newspaper’s management refused to send a representative, he was canceling the show. Here is the email Aron sent to Guy and me:

“I’ve decided to scuttle the show we were going to do on the future of the Star-Ledger. I am concerned that hearing from two or three former Ledger reporters without also hearing from someone who can explain the new enterprise is unfair, and our invitation to include a current staff member has been turned down. When we discussed this, Guy, you said that I could control the conversation, which is true. But it has been gnawing at me that I don’t know enough about the Ledger’s plans to hold up that end of the discussion. I apologise (cq) for the false start.”

Consider all of what’s wrong with this. Arguably the state’s best known public-medium news  guy, Michael Aron, cancels a show because he can’t learn enough about the topic. Let us also not forget that the big political player in NJTV, Steve Adubato, Jr., is both a big advertiser and columnist for The Star-Ledger (what? yes, that’s right–he often buys himself right on to the front page, the only columnist who could afford to do that). And, since when does a news outlet cancel a look into a major story because one of the sides refuses to comment? And since when should another news outlet refuse to comment–especially about a major story in which it is directly involved, like leaving the city it has served for nearly a century?

Now, to be honest, The Star-Ledger has not been serving Newark for a long time. Hardly covers the place and takes editorial positions that reflect the best interests of the suburban politicians who would like the city just to go away. Consider the extraordinary–almost embarrassingly fawning–support it has given Cami Anderson and the “One Newark” plan to disrupt the lives of tens of thousands of city families. The newspaper’s editorial board even went so far as to suggest that, because Anderson had done such an awful job, she should be given a new contract to help her fix it. Right.

But, Mr. Aron and all the other cowards at New Jersey News or whatever you’re called–history is at play here. This is a big news story, a once in a century story, a major change in the life of the largest city in the most urbanized state in the nation.

How could you guys duck it?

 

 

10 comments

  1. Barry Sussman

    The power of the purse controls the flow of information. The big money people want to eliminate Net neutrality so as to dominate that media too.
    When the free press is for sale to the highest bidders then the public is easily duped by propaganda. Third world here we come.

  2. TK

    The supine press will pop the bubbly and congratulate themselves on another win for “the view from nowhere.” But that is distinctly not your stripe, Bob, and is probably the thing which most brings me to your work. You take a stand and you pay the price. As a reader, I am going to learn as much as possible from your example. So, too, should any respectable journalist. As a parent and voter, I ask that you please continue to name names and draw connections. Someone needs to map this clusterflock, and I believe you know where many of the bones are. It is your beat, turn up the heat. How in the world can we live without a free press?

  3. DeeplyConcerned

    This trend could be cataclysmic for the future of Newark, NJ and the country. Christie, an aspiring demagogue, has used the weight of his personality to sledgehammer his way to power by exploiting the void left behind by a crippled free press. So his propaganda becomes “reality,” and his easily-deflated lies – always delivered with staunch resolve and insincere sincerity – become “straight shooting” and “blunt talk.” He may go down in flames, but those who follow in his footsteps might not.

  4. Rev. Tony Johnson

    There is nothing I can add to your analysis. All I can do is lament the death of real journalism in this state. There is still some good journalism in The Star Ledger, but that is in spite of the current management — not because of it — and little of it has to do with Newark. The Star Ledger is following the downward path that the once great Bergen Record took. Your blog, Facebook, and websites will become the media of the people. In 2008-09, while serving in an interim ministry in Plainfield, I saw some great reporting by Plainfield residents (one a retired Star Ledger reporter), partially making up for whatever excuse for a newspaper was then “serving” the Plainfields and adjacent communities. There are some mediocre weeklies in various towns in Essex County, but the great City of Newark, the smaller City of Orange (where I live), and the other parts of this urban — and to a lesser extent, suburban — county deserve better.

  5. Bill Chappel

    I suppose that Michael Aron would not cover news of a politician pleading the fifth because he can’t learn enough about the topic

  6. Perfect Opportunity

    This is the perfect opportunity for one of you veteran reporters to start a newspaper, blog or website. I for one will support you and I’m sure many others will also.
    Bob Braun: Don’t I have a website? What sort did you have in mind? Starting a newspaper could be a bit pricey. In 1972–42 years ago–The Star-Ledger bought out the Evening News of Newark for $40 million.

  7. P. Grunther

    I just called NJtvnews (973-233-8877) at the number they have online for sharing your views and left a message asking why they aren’t covering the story of the Star-Ledger’s move out of Newark and stating my opinion that they cannot ignore such an important story. I suggest that others do the same so at least some protest is registered with the station.

  8. Steve Lubetkin

    Hey Bob, if you are willing to bring your other guests to Cherry Hill, wwe can do a panel interview in my new studio. I can live stream or put it up as a recorded video podcast. Ping me at my email address and let’s discuss. Who needs broadcast TV?
    Bob Braun: Thanks. I will ask the others.

  9. Juan Gonzalez

    Don’t give up and please continue your relentless call to unmask this fraudulent hydra. This pattern of buying up the media is not unique to just one city. My own city of Baltimore has long seized to have any semblance of legitimate and intellectual news coverage…but there’s hope in the smaller outlets. Check out this article; I hope it motivates you continue your fight: http://nextcity.org/forefront/view/collapse-of-old-media-urban-newsroom-nonprofit-watchdog-cities

Post a comment


6 + five =

You may use the following HTML:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>